To Tudor or Not To Tudor?
I'm having trouble picking classes for next year and it is frustrating the hell outta me.
I'm enrolled in a Bachelor of Classical Studies at the Australian National University.
I major in Latin and Ancient History.
For each semester (of which there are two a year) you complete four classes, so eight in a year.
Next year is my final year. I shall have completed my Ancient History major in June. So aside from the classes needed to complete my Latin major, I have three slots free to choose what I want to do.
One course is I saw was Tudor-Stuart England, over a 300 year period. It's not really ancient enough for me to really consider it but it is an interesting period of English history. Plus there's no final exam because it's research based.
So do I Tudor or do I not Tudor???
Considering that I still have 6-7 months before I have to worry about it I'm probably just detracting from the studies I do have.
Damn my tired brain for figuring that out. Blissful ignorance was so much better than exhausted conscience.
- Tudor is interesting. This research based stuff is cool when you have enough other exams.. Kind of like my timetable now, in fact. I study the sciences, but one module does not have an exam....the other is practical work based, so I only have one module which has a final exam. With my short memory, I try to take anything which does not have an exam. The problem with research work is that there is nothing to fall back on if the research goes wrong.
This is written by me currently stressed out by the amount of research I need to do in two weeks....lol :D - Maybe three-door? :-P One of the better lines from "L. A. Story" hehe.
I've got no advice here though, so out of my league, but sounds like you do have some time to ponder (which sometimes can be a bad thing :P )
By 
By 
